Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Johnson-Cochran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Johnson-Cochran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources on the page and those I find online are simply mentions. There is one in-depth source in the Chicago Tribune I found but on closer examination it is a press release. There is also content on the page (some of which I removed) which is not supported by the references provided. Lots of bold claims as well which I cannot verify from a reliable secondary source. CNMall41 (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. CNMall41 (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete No significant coverage, couldn't verify a few claims in the article His film Love and Action in Chicago has received some critical attention and is borderline notable, but I'm not sure it's enough for him to fulfill WP:CREATIVE. Mooonswimmer 15:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.